All are welcome to read the full array of topics within the Discussion Index where EXPERIENCED fruit growers discuss valuable nuance.
Forum Index > Tree Fruit Nutrition > Soil samples
|
|
tassytwo 23 months ago
ActivityRank: 0
I totally agree. In my 2 year Cert IV Organic Ag course we did a lot of work
with soil and soil tests and from our own experience, a good and unbiased soil
test is a great tool to help us improve our soil. We get our soil tests done
organically through Kinsey Agricultural Services in America as we have found
them to be very unbiased and as they are not attached to any company selling
inputs have accurate organic input recommendations. Our teacher studied under
Neil, so I guess it also makes it easier for us to read as we did a lot of work
with his tests. It takes a bit of adjustment with the inputs as your
perecentages are different to ours in Australia. I would like to add as a
caution though that we did find in our studies of various recommendations on
the same piece of soil, that some of the recommendations from other labs were
somewhat suspect and if they had been followed the soil would not have been
improved in the long term with many minerals being locked up. Some soil tests,
or at least the recommendations, we saw actually would have been detrimental to
the soil. Something to be aware of and more the reason for us all to have a
basic understanding of soil chemistry rather than blindly following
recommendations. I have been surprised how many farmers never get soil tests.
Many organic farmers here also do not add soil tests as part of their
management practice. As an example of why soil testing is a good idea, on our
last place we would have added animal manures (composted) as part of our inputs
for the year as we had ample available on the farm in other areas and in a
sustainable management practice, would seem the logical choice. When our soil
test came back we had extremely high phosphorus, even though the general area
itself is generally phosphorus deficient. Had we done this we would have
created more lock ups and taken years to sort it out. Just curious David, when
you take your tests how deep does your drill go? and I wonder if this would add
iron to your results?
|
|
|
Chris Negronida 23 months ago
ActivityRank: 0
I would be interested in learning more about basic soil chemistry and how it
relates to tree health. If growers who have had experience with soil tests and
amendments would be willing to share their understanding soil chemistry and the
relationship between different nutrients and minerals I think it could be very
valuable on this forum as an alternative to recommendations found in test
results.
|
|
|
David Doncaster 23 months ago
ActivityRank: 0
The bit I use for the moment goes in 8-10" and I can go shallower or deeper if
I care to . Care to expand on adding iron ?
|
|
|
tassytwo 23 months ago
ActivityRank: 0
David, I thought the drill idea was a good one. One thing with any soil test is
to ensure there is no other element via the implement used that could effect
the result. I was wondering if the grinding motion of the drill could add iron
to the test result. In the types of implements that we use here for taking soil
samples (basically a hollow tube made of stainless steel that pulls a sausage
type sample there is no contamination of the sample. It is also a factor not to
touch the sample as this can effect the sodium readings, that sort of thing.
Chris, I would be happy to put something together on basic soil science if no
one else wants to do it - might take me a while though as we have just moved to
a new property and things are a bit hectic at the moment. I am sure there are
many others who know lots about this on this site. See how it goes and if
anyone else wants to do this a little faster than I could - still happy to give
it a go if the need is there.
|
|
|
tassytwo 23 months ago
ActivityRank: 0
Oh, as an extra Chris, I was thinking more for farmers to be able to check
amendments recommended rather than actually replace the recommendations
completely, although with enough understanding this would be possible if
someone wanted to go to that extent of study.
|
|
|
Michael Phillips 23 months ago
ActivityRank: 0
Just a plug for a Fruit Wiki page on Interpreting Soil Test Results for
Orchards. Another Fruit wiki page could be dedicated to Soil
Amendments for Orchards. Both would belong in the Growing Insights category. Discussion also certainly belongs in
posted messages as well, though now you might zero in even more specifically,
such as base saturation related to soil type or the need for zinc, say. I know
this post on soil sampling has me ready to get out there with my stainless
sample tube and test different blocks. This year it's my intention to send the
same sample to 4 or 5 different labs using network funding and then compare side-by-side
recommendations. This would involve A&L Eastern Labs, AgriEnergy Resources,
International Ag Labs, and a very biologically-minded consultant in Michigan. I
doubt I'll have the funding to include Neil Kinsey in this mix. Of course, I
won't be telling the labs what's really up here.
|
|
|
tassytwo 23 months ago
ActivityRank: 0
Your soil testing must be cheaper than in Australia. It is actually slightly
cheaper to send our tests to Neil Kinsey than to have them done in Australia.
Many of the labs here are also associated with a company and recommend their
products which our side by side tests revealed. I would be really interested to
see how your side by side tests compare.
|
ActivityRank: 0